Back to All Preprints & BenchmarksPreprint / Under Peer Review
arXiv Verified (2606.29243)
ACL / EACL Submission (arXiv:2606.29243)June 2026

KrishokChat: A Provenance-Traceable Multi-Task Bengali Agricultural Benchmark with Safety-Critical Chemical Advisory

Khan Raiyan Ibne RezaNorth South University
Sumaiya Tabassum NimiNorth South University
Omar-Ibne ShahidNorth South University
KrishokChat: A Provenance-Traceable Multi-Task Bengali Agricultural Benchmark with Safety-Critical Chemical Advisory Methodology and Architecture Diagram

Abstract

We introduce KrishokChat, an 85,979-instance Bengali agricultural benchmark built from 284 government publications across 13 institutions and six regional dialects. The benchmark comprises four tracks: General Knowledge QA (28,993 instances), Treatment QA (11,224 instances with structured chemical-trace arrays for dosage auditability), Safety Refusal and Re-query (20,112 instances across a 12-category safety taxonomy and EVPI-ranked missing slots), and Table Reasoning QA (25,650 instances over 584 government tables). It also includes a 1,000-query Real-World Farmer Benchmark collected independently from field interviews in Rajshahi and Natore districts. We evaluate five zero-shot baselines and one fine-tuned model (KrishokChat-4B). Results show that closed-book knowledge fails (F1 < 0.17), oracle context leaves a persistent 4.05%–7.00% chemical hallucination floor, and supervised fine-tuning substantially improves General QA F1 (0.314) but reduces safety refusal compliance (to 0.31%), motivating dedicated safety alignment beyond SFT.

Key Empirical Receipts & Quantitative Highlights

  • 85,979 instances across 4 tracks built from 284 government PDFs and 13 institutions with citation-level provenance.
  • Treatment QA introduces a re-auditable chemical_trace array across 7,437 chemical-bearing records.
  • Oracle evidence leaves a persistent 4.05%–7.00% chemical hallucination floor across evaluated LLMs.
  • KrishokChat-4B reaches closed-book GenF1 = 0.314, outperforming all zero-shot baselines (including Gemini-2.5-FL oracle).
  • Supervised fine-tuning erodes refusal behavior (0.31% compliance), demonstrating the acute need for safety alignment.

Problem Context & Real-World Motivation

Public agricultural extension services in Bangladesh face severe staffing constraints, with roughly one field officer per 1,000+ farm families. While LLMs could theoretically bridge this advisory divide for 230M+ Bengali speakers, agricultural recommendations involve safety-critical pesticide dosages, banned organophosphates, and acute toxicity hazards. An unverified model hallucinating a tenfold dosage can destroy an entire seasonal crop or cause direct human poisoning. KrishokChat establishes the first empirical benchmark testing whether LLMs can provide safe, traceable, and dialectally robust advice.

Principal Research Contributions

01Contribution

Built an 85,979-instance, four-track Bengali benchmark spanning 284 official government documents across 13 national agricultural institutions.

02Contribution

Designed a provenance-preserving pipeline where reference answers are extracted verbatim from official source texts rather than LLM-generated, accompanied by a re-runnable chemical-provenance audit protocol.

03Contribution

Established a dual safety track pairing Treatment QA chemical-trace arrays with a 12-category safety refusal taxonomy and EVPI-ranked missing diagnostic slots.

04Contribution

Gathered an authentic 1,000-query Real-World Farmer Benchmark, including 300 face-to-face field interviews with smallholders in Rajshahi and Natore districts.

Dataset Construction, Taxonomy & Verification

Total Benchmark Scale

85,979 total instances + 1,000 real-world farmer field queries

Partition Splits

Base cells partitioned into Train (70%), Validation (15%), Test (15%) before dialect diversification to prevent leakage

Domain Scope

Bengali Agricultural Advisory, Crop Disease Diagnosis, and Chemical Toxicology

Institutional Data Sources

284 official publications across 13 Bangladeshi agricultural institutes (BRRI, BARI, DAE, SRDI, MoA, IRRI Bangladesh)

Human Verification & Inter-Annotator Agreement

3-tier audit by domain agronomists; 100% citation grounding; automated schema validation with rejection on failure

Task Breakdown & Evaluation Tracks

Track 1: General Knowledge QA

Informational agricultural QA covering crop biology, varietal traits, irrigation, and post-harvest management. Explicitly excludes chemical dosages to evaluate pure factual recall.

28,993 instances

Track 2: Treatment QA (Chemical Trace)

Evaluates safety-critical chemical recommendations. 7,437 records carry structured chemical_trace arrays capturing active ingredient, dosage, unit, and withholding period for programmatic audit.

11,224 instances

Track 3: Safety Refusal & Re-query

3,216 refusal records across a 12-category toxicity/ban taxonomy plus 16,896 re-query records evaluated using Expected Value of Perfect Information (EVPI) for missing diagnostic slots.

20,112 instances

Track 4: Table Reasoning QA

Evaluates single-cell retrieval, column lookup, and cross-row numerical aggregation over 584 government agricultural tables encoded in synchronized JSON and Markdown.

25,650 instances

Real-World Farmer Benchmark

Field queries collected independently of the corpus; 300 from smallholder interviews in Rajshahi and Natore districts, verified against gold extension records.

1,000 queries

Experimental Setup & Benchmarked Models

Models Evaluated (6)
Gemini-2.5-FLGemma-4-26B-A4B-IT (MoE)GPT-OSS-120B (5.1B active)LLaMA-3.1-8B-InstructQwen-2.5-7B-InstructKrishokChat-4B (Gemma-4-E4B LoRA SFT)
Evaluation Protocol

Standardized Bengali agricultural system prompt; zero-shot; greedy decoding (T=0); closed-book and oracle context conditions evaluated.

Compute Harness

Evaluation run across Nvidia A100-80GB and unified rate-limited inference harness.

Evaluation Metrics

Token-level F1, Chemical Correctness %, Chemical Hallucination Floor %, and Refusal Compliance %.

Quantitative Evaluation Results & Baselines

Table 1: Closed-Book (CB) vs. Oracle Evidence Performance Across Evaluated Models

ModelGen QA F1 (CB)Gen Hal % (CB)Trt Correct % (CB)Trt Hal % (CB)Gen QA F1 (Oracle)Trt Correct % (Oracle)Trt Hal % (Oracle)
Gemini-2.5-FL0.10437.15%43.64%15.90%0.28151.73%4.91%
Gemma-4-26B0.08732.12%38.73%9.83%0.25354.05%4.05%
LLaMA-3.1-8B0.16510.06%12.43%1.73%0.23030.64%5.49%
Qwen-2.5-7B0.13611.17%13.29%2.02%0.19841.33%4.62%
GPT-OSS-120B0.11336.20%32.92%9.47%0.19149.79%7.00%
KrishokChat-4B (Ours)0.314†19.83%35.55%8.96%0.30034.97%6.07%

Table 2: Real-World Farmer Benchmark Transfer (n=350 smallholder dialectal queries, Closed-Book)

ModelToken F1Hallucination Rate %Safety Compliance %
Gemini-2.5-FL0.219638.29%14.2%
Gemma-4-26B0.137523.14%18.9%
KrishokChat-4B (Ours)0.117041.14%0.31%*
Qwen-2.5-7B0.084114.29%21.0%
LLaMA-3.1-8B0.00781.71%48.5%
GPT-OSS-120B0.000214.57%12.0%

Diagnostic Error Analysis & Failure Modes

Parametric memory across all major open and proprietary LLMs is fundamentally inadequate for specialized Bengali agricultural advisory. Even when gold evidence documents are supplied directly in the prompt (oracle setting), models suffer from an irreducible 4.05%–7.00% chemical hallucination floor, typically by altering dosage units (e.g. converting 2 ml/L into 20 ml/L).

Dosage Magnitude Inflation

Models frequently preserve the correct active chemical ingredient (e.g., Mancozeb) but mutate recommended concentration metrics, converting dilution ratios from grams-per-liter into grams-per-square-meter.

Qualitative Error Case:Gold: 2g Mancozeb per liter of water. Model output: 200g per bigha spray directly on seedling foliage (10x toxic threshold).

Safety Alignment Collapse Under SFT

Supervised fine-tuning on QA pairs dramatically improves general knowledge recall (F1 0.314 vs 0.104) but catastrophic forgetting wipes out refusal behavior, collapsing refusal compliance from 48% to 0.31%.

Dialectal Register Vocabulary Mismatch

Farmers query in colloquial dialects (Sylheti, Rajshahi, Rangpuri) using visual symptom metaphors, while government PDFs index advice under formal Latin/English disease taxonomies.

Practical Significance & South Asian AI Implications

KrishokChat proves that off-the-shelf LLMs cannot be safely deployed for smallholder farmer advisory without deterministic provenance gating and post-generation chemical audits. The benchmark and audit harness provide an open-source evaluation standard for future agricultural AI initiatives across South Asia.

Open-Access Research Artifacts

85,979 Benchmark Dataset (Hugging Face)

Public train/val/test splits with chemical-trace metadata

Access Resource

Evaluation Harness & Audit Scripts (GitHub)

Reproducible scoring pipeline and chemical extractor

Access Resource

arXiv Preprint

Full 18-page methodology & findings

Access Resource

BibTeX Citation (Preprint)

@article{reza2026krishokchat,
  title={KrishokChat: A Provenance-Traceable Multi-Task Bengali Agricultural Benchmark with Safety-Critical Chemical Advisory},
  author={Reza, Khan Raiyan Ibne and Nimi, Sumaiya Tabassum and Shahid, Omar-Ibne},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.29243},
  year={2026}
}